1. A source for the specific claim
Each name profile links to the consulted sources. Dictionaries support word senses; onomastic references support etymologies; PSA supports the stated birth counts and ranks. A link about a word is not evidence that it is a traditional or common baby name.
2. Uncertainty belongs in the explanation
Some familiar names have debated or unknown origins. “Possibly related to” must not become “means.” Related spellings and distinct names that look alike are discussed carefully. We do not create personality predictions, spiritual guarantees, or invented historical bearers.
3. A small dataset is still a small dataset
The PSA 2024 infographic lists ten boys’ names, ten girls’ names and five surnames. Our ranked pages use its given-name tables. Counts remain tied to that year, that category and that exact spelling. We do not extrapolate to the whole population or treat absence as zero.
4. Documented use needs its own evidence
Official biographies and institutional records establish that a particular person used a name. They do not establish national frequency or the origin of every person with that spelling. Profiles such as Ligaya, Lualhati and Luzviminda separate documentary usage from lexical meaning.
5. Words and languages deserve precision
Word-name entries keep the dictionary’s language labels and relevant sense distinctions. We use our own short summaries and link to the source for the full entry. A word-name card is an invitation to explore, not a claim of community approval or a verified pronunciation.